07-31-2006 06:46 AM - edited 03-13-2019 02:24 PM
Hello Folks,
Is there anything wrong using 9.@ as a route pattern? I am using it for my International calls. Here's the config that I have for my PRI:
LD PRI: 4ESS
4-digit DNIS
Require Mega COM Signaling
10 digits out pulse for Local / Long distance calls
Int?l call don?t require 011 but require a Int?l signaling
What is Mega Com and International Signaling?
Thanks,
07-31-2006 06:52 AM
there's nothing wrong with using 9.@ as a route pattern. especially in small environments, this is common.
the only thing to be sure of is to have the 9.@s partitioned so they are not available to devices unless they have specific permission to access that routePattern. (i don't let users use 9.@; like to keep detailed granularity)
07-31-2006 07:58 AM
Hi,
If you are using CCM 4.1.3 and above versions then other than partitions you can also restrict the access using FAC.
Regards,
07-31-2006 08:55 AM
You also want to be sure to create route filters for the different patterns. For example, if you have a 9.@ pattern for seven digit dialing, you want to build a route filter to match the dial string otherwise the you will have to wait for the interdigit timeout to set up the call.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide