Switchport Proctected alternative when IP Phones are used?
I have a setup that previously used "switchport protected" on a 3550 to prevent direct communications between PCs. We've since added Cisco 7940 phones and have found that switchport protected does its job too well and prevents our IP phones from communicating directly.
Has anyone discovered a way to prevent two hosts that are directly attached to IP Phones from communicating with other other while still allowing the IP Phones to directly communicate? Could this been done with PVLANs on a 3550?
You have reached the Cisco Logistics Support Center.. To Check Status of
your RMA, visit Product Returns & Replacements (RMA). Need help? Contact
us by Phone or Email. North Americas Phone: 1800 553 2447 Option 4
Email: email@example.com Europe Phone: +3...
The short answer is that you don't.... That isn't entirely true while at
the same time it kind of is, but for the most part you don't configure
the softkeys. You enable or disable them via TCL. Here is the long
answer. Be sure to read the whole thing or e...
Topology: IP Phone > Switches > Microsoft NPS setup to forward 802.1x
proxy to > ISE 2.1 patch 3 Authentication: EAP-TLS using Cisco MIC SANs
Phone Models 802.1X support? 802.1x flavor Addtl Comment EAP-MD5 EAP-TLS
Cisco 3905 Y Y N Cisco 6911 Y Y N Cisco ...