07-19-2000 04:00 AM - edited 03-12-2019 10:43 AM
What is the largest number of Tapi ports currently tested per Unity/Call Manager Server combo? The CM 3.0(1) currently can support up to 2500/node, can the tapi-integrated Unity match this?<br>Thanks.<br><br>
07-19-2000 04:00 AM
Hi Miguel
First, I need to make sure I understand your terminology correctly. I think you mean 2500 devices (i.e. phones), not TAPI connections. A TAPI connection corresponds to a port in Unity and you could never do 2500 of these (i.e. this would imply you could get 2500 simultaneous voice mail conversations going!).
Second, Cisco does not support their Call Manager being installed on a box with the voice mail server. Im assuming when you say combo that implies the voice mail server running on one box and the CM running on another.
Chatting with the Cisco guys, heres the formula they use for weighting a CM install. They allocate 3000 points per node and weight various types of connections differently. A TAPI connection using their TAPI driver counts as 30, a phone counts as 1, a gateway counts as 4, etc
You add them all up and you shouldnt exceed 3000 for each CM node.
OK
now I can tell you about our testing with the 2.4 version of the Cisco stuff
we were able to get 64 ports (i.e. 64 TAPI ports) running fairly comfortably with Ciscos TAPI driver and WAV driver. This means we could handle 64 simultaneous voice mail conversations. That port configuration should easily handle a fairly large number of subscribers.
We are currently testing CM 3.0 with the Unity TSP for Cisco Call Manager which uses the Skinny protocol with Ciscos WAV driver. Yeah, its kind of a mouthful
its usually referred to in house as the AVCiscoTSP for short. By comparison, the weight for the AVCiscoTSP is only 1 (instead of 30 for their original TAPI driver in CM 2.4). I dont have hard numbers to throw at you yet since its not out of testing and I dont want to be shooting my mouth off before weve covered all the bases, but it does look promising. When the load testing is complete you can be sure well publish the max ports supported for this configuration.
Stay tuned
Jeff Lindborg
Unity Product Architect
Active Voice Corp
jlindborg@activevoice.com
08-17-2000 07:18 AM
If I remember correctly according to AV recomendations, with 64 ports you can handle about 2000 users. Which brings up my question just how many users would you recomend be supported per Unity box. Lets say that it's on the Level Two Dell 2300 with the two processors, that you guys sell. What kind of hardware would you need to handle such a load of 64 ports?
08-22-2000 04:40 AM
OK
I think you have a couple of questions hidden in here. Lets see if I can get you the info youre looking for.
Im assuming since this question is in the IP section youre interested in Cisco. Before I go on, I have to say we have not completed our load testing and bench marking of the new AVCisco.TSP (the TSP formerly known as skinny) and the new Cisco WAV driver at this point. These numbers are based on our existing product configuration information for all systems on old school switch equipment. The hardware requirements may be different for the specific configuration youre looking to implement.
The first question is how many ports for how many users do we recommend. The short answer is it depends on how youre going to be using the system. If youre using it for auto attendant purposes (i.e. the Unity box is answering all incoming calls instead of a human) youre going to need higher port sizes to accommodate that, of course. If youre dealing with a DID environment where calls are forwarded to Unity on busy/RNA conditions and use of audio text is fairly light, your port limits can be lower. If your users are primarily using their desktops to get/send voice mail, you ports can go even lighter.
The old rule of thumb for a voice mail only environment was 25 users per port (which Im sure some folks out here would argue one way or the other I suspect). If it was a heavy audio text application youd bump that down a bit. For a primarily desktop messaging environment (say 2/3 of your folks are getting/sending most of their messages from the desktop) Id say that could be about doubled to around 50 users per port or more.
In most cases Id say 2000 users can be handled by 48 ports of voice if youre in a DID setting. Of course if theyre using paging and telephone notification heavily or theres other special considerations, youre going to have to take that into account. Port sizing a system is more of an art than a science.
The next question is what kind of hardware is recommended for X users and Y ports. If youre talking about 2000 users and 48 ports, the minimum wed support (according to our Product Configuration information used by our sales support folks) is a single 500 Mz processor, 256 meg RAM and a RAID with data stripped configuration (3 drives stripped minimum, 2 mirrored). If it were me, and I wanted to make sure it performed well, Id probably kick that up to 512 meg RAM.
This assumes fax services are handled by another server. Fax should always be run on another server if you can get away with it in my opinion but for port sizes greater than 24 we require it.
I hope that covered what you were looking for. Let me know if you were fishing for something else.
Jeff Lindborg
Unity Product Architect
Active Voice Corp
jlindborg@activevoice.com
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide