From an interoperability and support standpoint, Id stick with Cisco. VCON is a small overseas company whose value has dropped over 80% in the past 52 weeks. Side-by-side feature comparison looks similar at a glance. For your second question, any H.323 Version 2 compliant gateway is supported with the Cisco MCM.
VCON MXM is a "near" ITU compliant Gatekeeper, as well as a management tool for VCON endpoints. The problem with MXM is that it cannot recognize neighbor gatekeepers such as MCM or RADVision ECS, which makes it problematic is a large disparate network based on Cisco routing. Stick with MCM and you will have interoperability.
SIP traces provide key information in troubleshooting SIP Trunks, SIP
endpoints and other SIP related issues. Even though these traces are in
clear text, these texts can be gibberish unless you understand fully
what they mean. This document attempts to br...
Please find the attached HTML document, download and open it on your PC.
This provides an easy to use form where you simply answer a few
questions and it will render the proper jabber-config.xml file for you
to copy/paste. There is built in logic to verif...
CUCM Database Replication is an area in which Cisco customers and
partners have asked for more in-depth training in being able to properly
assess a replication problem and potentially resolve an issue without
involving TAC. This document discusses the bas...