pvlan (promiscuous port) not permitted on etherchannel
This is probably an often-asked question: I've read in the 7K v5.0(2) NX-OS docs, the 6500 12.2SXF/SXH IOS docs and the 5K docs that the pvlan feature cannot co-exist with etherchanneling on the same uplink. This would assumedly include promiscuous trunk ports.
This seems so counter-productive and self-defeating. Especially where the 7K vPC feature is cfg'd requiring LACP etherchannels from the single switch into both 7Ks.
What am I missing here? Is there a work-around short of new dedicated links? The cost of the 10G optics for that approach is prohibitive. Is it possibly on the road-map for some future upgrades?
Maybe I could configure an unconditional port-channel with no protocol, no negotiation? I'm waiting on the vDC licensing to let me direct-connect the lab 5Ks.
Introduction This article will help you understand the steps on how to
download the UCS licenses from the Cisco Systems website and then
installing it on the UCS. The redacted (blue lines) just covers up
certain numbers for privacy please do not take them...
Introduction This article will help you understand and educate the
customer on how to clear their "expired licenses"
(license-graceperiod-expired) from their UCS-M. If a customer just
purchased a license and needs a step by step guide on how to download
==================== VIC FNIC driver does not support Virtual Volumes (
second level LUN ID ) An enhancement request has been created to track
this feature - CSCux64473 UPDATE - 12-14-2016 We made some traction on
the enhancement request - The Fix is in t...