i 've just finished setting up a new L3 environment in my costumer's LAN, previously they're using a 2610 router for their interVLAN routing
they have 3 VLAN (VLAN 1/Legacy, VLAN 21/SAP_Server's farm and VLAN 22/SAP_Client)
All the SAP Server's are newest IBM Server's and the spec is about 2-4 processor of Pentium3 Xeon with more than 1Gb of RAM and using "Broadcom 10/100/1000T Ethernet cards"
before upgrading to the new L3 we have few benchmark test using "iperf" tool to see the throughput traffic performance in and between VLAN's and the results are just like :
1. between the same VLAN the throughput is about 80-90Mbps
2. from VLAN 21 to VLAN 22 the throughput is ONLY about 7-10 Mbps (i assume this is happening because we're using 2610 to route between VLAN instead of using L3 switches)
after they have the budget to upgrade their network so i proposed a new L3 Switche (Cat 3550 12T) to replace the R 2610 for the InterVLAN switching
and after configure it today we run the test again just like before upgrading.
The new environment i've just set up is like this
- We have upgraded the NIC on the server's side from 10/100Mbps to 1000Mbps and directly connected to the 3550-12T switches
- the client's still using 10/100 Mbps and connected to other 3500XL-12 and some 3500XL-24
- The link between each switch is using 1000SX and some using 1000BaseT
And the test results is : (all the test are running on the test environment (i mean is there is no such user activity, the switch and server is just performing the bench)
1 Between the same VLAN 22 (10/100Mbps Environment) the throughput is about 80-90Mbps
2 Between VLAN 21 and 22 the throughput is just about the same 80-90Mbps
(this is as i've been expecting BUT )
3 BUT between the same VLAN 21 (FULL 1000BaseT environment and directly connected to the 3550-12T) the performance is just 160-200Mbps only
Actually this is my first real L3 configuration using L3 Switches. and luckyly i can configure it to work (thanks to the config example)
My question is :
WHY the performance in the full 1000BaseT environment is just only 160-200Mbps (only about 2 times than the 100Mbps environment), i assume the improvement should be about 500-600Mbps, please correct me if i'm wrong.
If some of you would like to see my configuration on the L3 switches please just let me know i'll be happy to post it here.
bytes transferred/sec,and any parameter that might indicate a bottleneck. Also what "version" of the SCSI protocol are you using? Ultra2, Ultra160 or Ultra320 etc. make sure that you're not maxing out the SCSI bus.
What you are seeing could be correct , just read about a test using full duplex fast ethernet versus gigabit and in some cases the transfer rates were not much better for the gigabit versus full duplex fast ether . Maybe the servers can't pump it out any faster than what you are seeing ...
We are pleased to announce availability of Beta software for 16.6.3.
16.6.3 will be the second rebuild on the 16.6 release train targeted
towards Catalyst 9500/9400/9300/3850/3650 switching platforms. We are
looking for early feedback from customers befor...
Introduction Featured Speakers Luis Espejel is the Telecommunications
Manager of IENova, an Oil & Gas company. Currently he works with Cisco
IOS® and Cisco IOS XE platforms, and NX to some extent. He has also
worked as a Senior Engineer with the Routing P...
In this session you can learn more about Layer 3 multicast and the best
practices to identify possible threats and take security measures. It
provides an overview of basic multicast, the best security practices for
use of this technology, and recommendati...