Thank you for such a quick and to the point response. I like it. Can you expand on why the IOS said it is a valid command for me, please? I have gone over all the documentation I could find on the topic and came to the same conclusion you told me. The thing that bothers me is the IOS seem to think it is a valid command syntax until I try to execute the command. Is this going to be available in later OS releases?
Is this command structure available in the Sup II using the CatO/S?
The same applies to policy routing commands, which are visible, and even enterable on the command line, but do not actually work. Cisco will apparently add this particular feature early next year.
It looks like they stripped down the IOS to get it working more quickly on the new Supevisor III, and are then adding the actual functionality back in over time (I'm guessing on this). IPX and AT are also not available
We have 3 identical switches configured by someone else and would like to claim some of the Gigabit ports(G1/G2/G3/G4) for use on servers. When we try to change the wiring and configuration, we run in to connectivity issues. Attached is a des...
This is actually a pretty cool feature, i didn't even know it existed until I was looking for a solution to advertise a subnet (prefix in BGP talk), only if a certain condition existed. This is exactly what conditional advertisements does
j ai une question j ai achete un routeur cisco 887VA-k9 , je le configuré avec la configuration ci- dessous
si je le lier avec mon pc portable sur l un de ses ports directement ça marche toute est bien ( la connexion internet + m...