06-18-2006 11:03 PM - edited 03-03-2019 03:42 AM
Is there any way to influence return traffic from server access to users for user/server access switches directly attached to a pair of core switches.
Client has a pair 6500/720 in the core and legacy server/user access switches directly attached. He wanted to load balance the user switches across the cores. The server switches connect to both Core 1 and 2 but based on a L2 redundant link utilty have primary on Core 1 and backup on Core 2. A User access switch pair with two VLAN's would load balance outbound via HSRP. But seems to me all the return traffic will go via the server switch core 1 connection etc. I've suggested Layer 3 for the server switches so that the return traffic can be influenced via OSPF costs. Are there any other ways of doing this?
06-18-2006 11:10 PM
Hello Les,
Please refer to this document:
Asymmetric Routing and HSRP (Excessive Flooding of Unicast Traffic in Network with Routers That Run HSRP)
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk648/tk362/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094afd.shtml#t8
HTH
Leon
* Please rate posts.
06-19-2006 11:48 PM
Hi Leon/All,
Good doc but it provides a way to avoid unicast flooding as a result of Assymetric routing.
I was looking for some way to avoid assymetric routing in the absence of multiple router hops.ie default gateways spread a cross a collapsed core. Any ideas?
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide