Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. And see here for current known issues.

New Member

Backbone Fast vs. Uplink Fast?

After reading Cisco's documentation (http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat5000/rel_5_5/sw_cfg/stp_enha.htm)

I'm confused - when does one use Backbone Fast as opposed to Uplink Fast ?

Seems to me that they both do the same thing. I have a three switches set up in a triangle, with Switch A at the apex, and switches B and C at the base. (Switch A is in the computer room and B and C are switches in the closets.) I want the traffic to flow from B to C and onto A (or from C to B and onto A) if the link between B and A fails. (or C to A fails). Which "Fast" do I use??

5 REPLIES
New Member

Re: Backbone Fast vs. Uplink Fast?

From "http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/103.html" "Cisco recommends that UplinkFast be enabled for switches with blocked ports, typically at the access layer" and "The Cisco recommendation to to enable Backbone Fast on all switches running STP". These are small quotes taken from a 56 page document. I recommend that you read the document before you impliment.

New Member

Re: Backbone Fast vs. Uplink Fast?

Just to reiterate, *do not* enable backbone fast in a mixed environment. That is if any of the switches might participate in redundant paths in the spanning tree cannot have backbone fast enables e.g. 2900,3500 or non-cisco switches, backbonefast must not be enable on any switches.

btw the basic difference is that uplinkfast only allows quick failover of connected links (ie. blocked ports) whereas backbonefast removes the can detect topology changes due to indirect link failures.

Both documents mentioned give a quite thorough description anyhow

New Member

Re: Backbone Fast vs. Uplink Fast?

Uplink Fast : This is to enable the blocked port when the root port link is failed.

For example, you can enable uplinkfast on C when the normal link betwen B and A goes down, or on B when the normal link goes down between C and A. So you will be saved in such kind of situations.

Backbone. Fast:- This can be enabled when the switch doesn't have blocked port and root port receives inferior BPDU.

If the inferior BPDU arrives on the root port and there are no blocked ports, the switch assumes that it has lost connectivity to the root bridge, causes the maximum aging time on the root to expire, and the switch then becomes the root switch according to normal spanning-tree rules.

Just enable uplink fast.

New Member

Backbone fast can be enabled

Backbone fast can be enabled NOT only if the switch DOESN´T have blocked ports.

BackboneFast provides FAST convergence in the network backbone after a spanning tree topology change occurs. A switch detects an  INDIRECT  link failure (the failure of a link to which the switch is not directly connected) when the switch receives inferior BPDUs from its designated bridge on its root port or BLOCKED port.

If the inferior BPDU arrives on the root port, all  BLOCKED  ports become alternate paths to the root bridge.

If arrives on the root port and THERE ARE  NO BLOCKED  ports, the switch assumes that it has lost connectivity to the root bridge, causes the maximum aging time on the root to expire, and becomes the  ROOT SWITCH according to normal spanning tree rules.

Re: Backbone Fast vs. Uplink Fast?

The above answers are fine answers.

But I have an even better answer - who cares? While xxxFast are not quite obsolete yet, they are now considered to be legacy, and Cisco (and the rest of the industry )has moved on to new and improved STP algorithms. So unless you're stuck with a legacy network...

9341
Views
15
Helpful
5
Replies
CreatePlease login to create content