I have a Cisco 2621 running IPPlus IPSec56 with a 1710 and 1720 connecting to it with crypto Ipsec tunnels. I have recently had some problems and have found in troubleshooting there are different ways to configure this setup and would like to know the recommended way.
Where 2 peers will be referenced in my crypto maps on the 2621, is it best to have the map listed twice(with separte priorities-same map name) for each peer and a seperate ACL for each map priority? or better to have each peer listed in the same map priority and have a single ACL that includes both peers' networks?
Also, would there be any problems(such as routing loops) in listing the 'other' 2 peers on each of my 3 routers?
Often times complex configuration issues are best addressed in an interactive session with one of our trained technical assistance engineers. While other forum users may be able to help, its often difficult to do so for this type of issue.
Really? Is this generic respone automatically posted after a certain amount of time?
I didn't think my post was that complex. I listed 2 ways of doing what i was doing and asked for the recommended way. Encrypted data tunnels in both hub and spoke and mesh configurations ahve to be fairly common as there exists many articles on this from router to router. I just haven't seen articles on the mesh configuration with lower series hardware like i'm using (2621, 1720, 1721).
We are pleased to announce availability of Beta software for 16.6.3. 16.6.3 will be the second rebuild on the 16.6 release train targeted towards Catalyst 9500/9400/9300/3850/3650 switching platforms. We are looking for early feedback from custome...