I dont think i need to run VTP Server on core switch as i am going to have all VLANS within that switch?
>> then you need to make the VTP a tranparent mode as you cannot create a vlan on a VTP client. I think maybe what you meant is you will have all user in a particular switch be in the same vlan, for example,
3560 1/1---vlan 5---CE500---users in vlan 5
In this case you do not need trunking .
Or Can anyone suggest what should be the best practice in this situation.
>> If your planned set-up is identical to above then this is an acceptable set-up and actually quite good for it's simplicity.
Well if you are looking for 'best practice' for VLANs, my suggestion is still the same, that is to use VTP. Else if you just want to work without VTP, then make different VLANs on the core switch according to ur need. And then connect various workgroup switches to it after adding the respective VLANs on them too. Also as earlier suggested make all of them run in VTP transparent mode. Make sure all the switches are running in VTP transparent mode and NOT in server mode before all the final connections are made.
This is actually a pretty cool feature, i didn't even know it existed until I was looking for a solution to advertise a subnet (prefix in BGP talk), only if a certain condition existed. This is exactly what conditional advertisements does
j ai une question j ai achete un routeur cisco 887VA-k9 , je le configuré avec la configuration ci- dessous
si je le lier avec mon pc portable sur l un de ses ports directement ça marche toute est bien ( la connexion internet + m...
Attached policy provides CLI access to the Cisco 4G router over text messaging. Two files are in the attached .tar file:
2. PDF with instructions on how to load and use the .tcl file.