We all know that swicthing is done in hardware. So the question is, when the 'Show proc cpu' command is entered does displayed result reflect the amount of switching taking place or is it showing how busy the background (non switching) processes are?
The reason for my question is this. We have a c5500 switch and a c6000 series switch performing similar tasks. The c5500s cpu is frequently running at 24-48% and the c6000 series switch runs at about 7%. Both switches perform similar functions and have similar traffic throughput.
So, why the big difference in cpu usage?
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Just a note. When the 'show system' command in enetered the cpu untilization values are much lower.
The statistics reported is only for the control processes that run on the CPU. With regard to your question on why cat5K consumes more cpu than cat6K can probably only be answered by Cisco as this could be due to some architectural differences. My guess is that Cat5K uses ROSM (Route Once Switch Many) technique, which might be consuming CPU resource for every first packet in a flow. Whereas Cat6K employs CEF to switch all including the first packet. May be this is the reason you see less utility of CPU in Cat6K.
We are pleased to announce availability of Beta software for 16.6.3.
16.6.3 will be the second rebuild on the 16.6 release train targeted
towards Catalyst 9500/9400/9300/3850/3650 switching platforms. We are
looking for early feedback from customers befor...
Introduction Featured Speakers Luis Espejel is the Telecommunications
Manager of IENova, an Oil & Gas company. Currently he works with Cisco
IOS® and Cisco IOS XE platforms, and NX to some extent. He has also
worked as a Senior Engineer with the Routing P...
In this session you can learn more about Layer 3 multicast and the best
practices to identify possible threats and take security measures. It
provides an overview of basic multicast, the best security practices for
use of this technology, and recommendati...