I have three classes define in CBWFQ. The class with the most traffic (batch transfers) is only allocated 10% of bandwidth, while real time/interactive traffic is allocated to a class which gets 65% of bandwidth. When the batch transfer class gets a lot of traffic, I see lots of packet drops in that class. So far so good,as this is the traffic that I want to be penalized. The interactive traffic class however still sees a relatively high number of drops for the little traffic it has to sends. I would think that the interactive class would not drop packets unless it needs to use more then 65% of bandwidth....Is this normal behavior ? If so, how can it be explained ? The policy is attached to an ATM OC3 interface on a 7500 router. Seems like the weight provided by the bandwidth statement is not enough to avoid drops for the interactive traffic.
This document gives several answers on frequently asked questions for PFRv3 channel state behavior.
Q1: What are all the channel operational states from a BR (border role) perspective and what are the rules/conditions to be in each st...
The need was to reach an host inside a LAN through a VPN connection managed by the LAN gateway (Cisco 1921).
The LAN gateway performs NAT and there was a dedicate nat rule for the host i wanted to reach through VPN.
I couldn't connect to the hos...
We have 3 identical switches configured by someone else and would like to claim some of the Gigabit ports(G1/G2/G3/G4) for use on servers. When we try to change the wiring and configuration, we run in to connectivity issues. Attached is a des...