I am brainstorming on this wondered if anybody had any ideas on it.
Cisco 2600 with working Internet Connection, switched Internetproviders, and for the short term to wait on DNS to propogate, I would like for both connections to be up and on the Internet, yet I would need for two NAT pools to be running and know to route at the Interface that it recieved the packet on.
I have looked at the Route map ispnat, type of setup but haven't used it. Wondered if anybody had any feedback on it.
Also, I see how this would work with say a 2600 with 2 wic's although could this be done on 2 2600's with 1 wic, keeping in mind that the default gateway will only be set to 1 of them.
Thanks in advance, the config I am thinking of useing one router is simular to below.
ip nat inside source static 18.104.22.168 22.214.171.124 route-map isp2
ip nat inside source static 126.96.36.199 188.8.131.52 route-map isp1
ip nat inside source static 184.108.40.206 220.127.116.11 route-map isp2
ip nat inside source static 18.104.22.168 22.214.171.124 route-map isp1
access-list 101 permit ip 126.96.36.199 0.0.0.255 188.8.131.52 0.255.255.255
access-list 102 permit ip 184.108.40.206 0.0.0.255 192.0.0.0 0.255.255.255
If you would like to use two separate NAT pools for each ISP, a route-map can be used to choose the appropriate global address. In the route-map you can match both on the inside local addess as well as the next-hop address of ISP1 or ISP2 to which the packet is going to be forwarded and then translate it by linking the route-map to the pool configured with the address given by the corresponding service provider. There is a similar example in the Ciscopress book Routing TCP/IP vol.II by Jeff Doyle The syntax of your NAT configuration seems to be wrong. You cannot use a static translation for this. You need to use the 'ip nat inside source route-map ...." commands. Check if this link helps you :
Hi everyone, I would like to thank you in advance for any help you can provide a newcomer like myself!
Im studying the 100-105 book by Odom and am currently on the topic of Port security. I purchased a used 2960 and I'm trying to follow a...
While deploying a number of 18xx/2802/3802 model access points (APs), which run AP-COS as their operating platform. It can be observed on some occasions that while many of their access points were able to join the fabric WLC withou...