the ISP's are different, but I want no to create a tunnel between the isp routers. Behind the ISP Routers there are two cisco 1841 with two ethernet connectors and i want to create a tunnel between these two ciscos.
in your previous message you have clearly mentioned that its gonna be a dynamic nat at the SP end ,with this i dont think you will be able to setup the tunnels since the ip address required for the reachability between the routers may vary.
In case of creating vpn tunnels u shuld have atleast static ip at one end and u can have dynamic ip at the other ends.
so i dont think its possible out here with the current setup at ur locations to have the vpn connectivity.
the ip address from the ciscos 1841 will be a static an officially address.
What i need to know is, if the spoke setup a tunnel to the static officiall ip address from the hub, which spoke ip address is relevant for the tunnel construction, the dynamic address from the ISP router (nat) or the static address from the spoke?
This is actually a pretty cool feature, i didn't even know it existed until I was looking for a solution to advertise a subnet (prefix in BGP talk), only if a certain condition existed. This is exactly what conditional advertisements does
j ai une question j ai achete un routeur cisco 887VA-k9 , je le configuré avec la configuration ci- dessous
si je le lier avec mon pc portable sur l un de ses ports directement ça marche toute est bien ( la connexion internet + m...
Attached policy provides CLI access to the Cisco 4G router over text messaging. Two files are in the attached .tar file:
2. PDF with instructions on how to load and use the .tcl file.