I currently have a Cisco 7206VXR (256M RAM - IOS 12.2(3) enterprise) running BGP over ATM STM-1 and FA0/0 utilising 802.1Q. Currently it has 10 peers configured, of which 3 are IBGP (approx 10,000 routes), 1 eBGP (105,000 routes), 3 partial peers (20,000 routes) and 3 Customer peers (100 routes). When viewing BGP CPU utilisation (show proc cpu | include BGP), the BGP scanner is constantly at 50-70% utilisation. The router becomes CPU bound every 10-15min causing all OSPF and BGP sessions to restart. During this period all routing is lost.
When removing the 1 upstream peer (105,000 routes), the router stabilizes and the BGP scanner CPU usage returns the 0-3%. Can anyone suggest what could be the cause? Cisco Engineers, maybe?
p.s. I have soft-reconfiguration inbound configured on all BGP connections. I have 6 OSPF sessions configured with a total of 500 routes. No protocol re-distribution between BGP and OSPF. Static routes are re-distributed into OSPF.
Thanks for your response. I have the NSE-1 R7000 CPU type. I think you might of hit the cause on the head. I am investigating this avenue. Do you know of any past issue with NSE-1 controllers and high CPU load when handling the Internet routing table?
1) Make sure "no synchronization" is listed under your BGP router process
2) Disable Soft Reconfiguration
Also, not to be picky, but you are kind of on the bleeding edge running 12.2 code on a production box. You might want to consider backing off into something in the 12.0.xS train or the 12.1.xT train (whatever is appropriate for your hardware configuration).
Thanks for your response. No synchronization is enabled under the BGP config. Disabling soft-reconfiguration will cause me a lot of heart-ache. Have you seen a problem like I have, fixed by disabling soft-reconfig?
IOS 12.2(3), has been tested with my configuration thoroughly and it has proven very reliable. I am running this version for the last 6-8 months. Any thoughts?
The IOS version is more effective, if you can get the IOS release 12.0(18)S3 image, it's great, because, some big ISP using this image, and this is recommended by TAC to ISP, so, I belive it's a stable release(Note: Do NOT use the 12.0(19)S images).
Another recommendis is separate the BGP and Interdomain routing from one system.
BTW, could you please execute some show command and past the result on this board:
show ip bgp summary
show ip bgp neighbor xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
(where the xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx is the ip address of you service provider's BGP peer.)
Hi everyone, I would like to thank you in advance for any help you can provide a newcomer like myself!
Im studying the 100-105 book by Odom and am currently on the topic of Port security. I purchased a used 2960 and I'm trying to follow a...
While deploying a number of 18xx/2802/3802 model access points (APs), which run AP-COS as their operating platform. It can be observed on some occasions that while many of their access points were able to join the fabric WLC withou...
I am going to design and build an LAN network under a tunnel underground with long distance between the switches.
I will have 2 Catalyst switches and 8 Industrial IE3000, and they will be connected with fiber.
For now I am planning on use Layer-2 s...