We have 3 Cisco 4507's, all have 2 supervisor modules and we have GBIC's in all of them. My question is can we use the supervisor uplinks to connect these switched together. We will not be using fiber, it will be CAT 6 connections. Is the only way to pass information across multiple switches to create trunk ports?
It is a kind of mixing, I see. Of course, you may use supervisors ports to interconnects your switches to each other. In some situations you may not use all ports because of the active-standby limitations, but you definitely may use some ports on active supervisors. Concerning trunks it is not clear now what do you mean. You may use access port, of course, but in switching environment it is a best practice - to interconnect switches witha 802.1Q trunks. For many-many reasons.
Using fibers for switch interconnection is not a requirement.
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Is the only way to pass information across multiple switches to create trunk ports?
Depends whether your Supervisors support L3, if they do, you can route between the 4500s.
This document gives several answers on frequently asked questions for PFRv3 channel state behavior.
Q1: What are all the channel operational states from a BR (border role) perspective and what are the rules/conditions to be in each st...
The need was to reach an host inside a LAN through a VPN connection managed by the LAN gateway (Cisco 1921).
The LAN gateway performs NAT and there was a dedicate nat rule for the host i wanted to reach through VPN.
I couldn't connect to the hos...