The answer as I'm sure know is: it depends. What is you objective for redundancy and performance? You need to weigh the options. Would the cold swap unit be identical to the device in production? How much time would it take to swap if there was a failure? Would any load-balancing benefit your network traffic? It would be my vote if you have two identical switches to configure them for redundancy and utilize the additional port realestate / bandwidth to load-balance your traffic.
I agree with the previous poster. If the switches are the same, I think it would be best to design a network that would use both of them in a redundant/balanced fashion. This would yield both network resilency and increased performance. No sense in spending $$$ on gear that is only going to be used if there is a critical failure in the core.
Hi everyone, I would like to thank you in advance for any help you can provide a newcomer like myself!
Im studying the 100-105 book by Odom and am currently on the topic of Port security. I purchased a used 2960 and I'm trying to follow a...
While deploying a number of 18xx/2802/3802 model access points (APs), which run AP-COS as their operating platform. It can be observed on some occasions that while many of their access points were able to join the fabric WLC withou...
I am going to design and build an LAN network under a tunnel underground with long distance between the switches.
I will have 2 Catalyst switches and 8 Industrial IE3000, and they will be connected with fiber.
For now I am planning on use Layer-2 s...