There are numerous minor differences but the primary difference is that HSRP uses the all Multicat Router address 188.8.131.52 and VRRP uses a dedicated Multicast address of 184.108.40.206, this is a lot more efficent as 220.127.116.11 is used by muliple protocols.
For full details of the two please refer to the RFC's:
HSRP is a protocol developed by Cisco that enables several routers on a LAN to work together to provide a phantom router IP and MAC address for workstations to use as a default gateway. If the active HSRP router goes down, a standby HSRP router takes over and becomes the active router. This ensures that the workstations alway have a default gateway to communicate with.
VRRP is the rest of the internetworking industry's standardized version of a protocol that does basically the same thing as Cisco's HSRP. The advantage to VRRP is that it can be used to provide redundancy between different vendors' equipment.
At one point, Cisco claimed that VRRP infringed on the HSRP patent. But it would seem that point of contention no longer exists, since VRRP is still available. It is even showing up in some Cisco products, although that is the result of company acquisitions. It is not due to deliberate efforts by Cisco to be interoperable with other vendors.
Here's some insight into the technical details of the two protocols.
And here's a summary of the key difference between the two:
"The key difference between VRRP and HSRP, and Digital's scheme, is authentication. HSRP has a password field, including a default value, which translates to "cisco," for the installation of parameters, but there is no other form of security. Security is critical because it provides a useful function and the IESG is now insisting that all new protocols include appropriate security mechanisms."
Hi everyone, I would like to thank you in advance for any help you can provide a newcomer like myself!
Im studying the 100-105 book by Odom and am currently on the topic of Port security. I purchased a used 2960 and I'm trying to follow a...
While deploying a number of 18xx/2802/3802 model access points (APs), which run AP-COS as their operating platform. It can be observed on some occasions that while many of their access points were able to join the fabric WLC withou...
I am going to design and build an LAN network under a tunnel underground with long distance between the switches.
I will have 2 Catalyst switches and 8 Industrial IE3000, and they will be connected with fiber.
For now I am planning on use Layer-2 s...