I do have two routers running OSPF but within different process ids. They're connected thru both LAN interfaces and each of those pertains to different ids. Both routers have setup adjency. I'd like to know if this is a right approach of connection between two routers running ospf. I particularly have never saw this before, usually routers are in the same process id and interfaces in the same area.
The OSPF process id is local to a router, so this is not a problem for adjacencies. Two routers don't need to have the same process id to become adjacent. Regarding the interfaces on different areas, I'm afraid I didn't understand your problem, but anyway: if two routers are connected to the same segment/subnet they have to agree on the area, that is, that subnet has to belong to one area only, otherwise there will be an area mismatch.
Thanks Nuno. Ya you're right, the routers have their interface in the same area, therefore it seems to be fine. I was wondering about the process ids as It doens't like to be a regular approach, but anyway you cleared by doubt.
This is actually a pretty cool feature, i didn't even know it existed until I was looking for a solution to advertise a subnet (prefix in BGP talk), only if a certain condition existed. This is exactly what conditional advertisements does
j ai une question j ai achete un routeur cisco 887VA-k9 , je le configuré avec la configuration ci- dessous
si je le lier avec mon pc portable sur l un de ses ports directement ça marche toute est bien ( la connexion internet + m...
Attached policy provides CLI access to the Cisco 4G router over text messaging. Two files are in the attached .tar file:
2. PDF with instructions on how to load and use the .tcl file.