We have 2 Clustered File & Print servers setup using Legato CoStandby Server, each with an Intel Pro/100S Dual Port Server Adapter and a dedicated link between the servers. The ports on each card are configured as a Team, and are forced at Full duplex, 100 MB. On the Cisco 3524XL Switch, the ports are configured at Full duplex, 100 MB - but are not configured in a Port Group. With this configuration we were experiencing MAC Address Flapping on each switch that the servers were connected to. We also tried connecting each port to a different switch and received similar errors. I believe that our problem is due to the fact that the MAC address is the same for both ports on the dual port adapters, which was causing a loop between the 2 ports on the switches that the servers were connected? If this is true, could we hardcode the MAC address on both ports of the switch - or would we be better off scrapping the dual port adapter and using 2 separate NIC's?
We attempted the Port Group option in a test environment and noticed performance degradation on the servers so we avoided it. Do you know of any performance issues when creating a port group? Should spanning-tree portfast be enabled? We would also like to avoid plugging both connections into the same switch to provide redundancy.
I believe that if you want link redundancy AND bandwidth teaming, you'd need two dual NICs.
One dual NIC would be configured for aggregating bandwidth connected to switch "A" as the primary (operating) channel, the second dual NIC would be configured for bandwidth teaming and set as a redundant (non-functioning until primary failure) connection to switch "B."
My understanding is that for any pair of ports, they can be configured for aggregation (like Etherchannel) or redundancy, but not both concurrently.
Hi everyone, I would like to thank you in advance for any help you can provide a newcomer like myself!
Im studying the 100-105 book by Odom and am currently on the topic of Port security. I purchased a used 2960 and I'm trying to follow a...
While deploying a number of 18xx/2802/3802 model access points (APs), which run AP-COS as their operating platform. It can be observed on some occasions that while many of their access points were able to join the fabric WLC withou...
I am going to design and build an LAN network under a tunnel underground with long distance between the switches.
I will have 2 Catalyst switches and 8 Industrial IE3000, and they will be connected with fiber.
For now I am planning on use Layer-2 s...