Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. If you'd prefer to explore, try our test area to get started. And see here for current known issues.

New Member

DUMP MEM ERROR

Hi ,

I have a router cisco 3620 with 1 NM-1E and 1 NM-2E-2W + 1 WIC-1T.

THis router is configured for 4 TUNNEL GRE and With IPSEC enable on these tunnel.

The serial iterface is configured as default route. With these configuration there are no problem.

I attached an other router 2610 (for Internet access) in the same ethernet of the 3620 and after I put in shutdown the serial int of 3620.... I changed the default route on 3620 from serial to the ip address of 2610.

when I do this operation the 3620 crash. I see that if I disable the crypto map ont the GRE TUNNEL the 3620 don't crash.

I try to change the IOS fram 12.0 to 12.1 and 12.2.

Why if my default route on 3620 is serial don't crash with IPSEC enable .... while If my default route is a next hop ip address CRASH .?????

this is my dump crash:

========= Dump bp = 3594978 ======================

3594878: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

3594898: 0 0 0 0 0 C07AC01 B0D0E1 15860800

35948B8: 4500004E CF280000 7F1111E2 AC100171 AC120101 AC61A09 3AB5FC 30300201

35948D8: 40670 75626C69 63A02302 4180E30 33020100 2010030 15301306 F2B0601

35948F8: 4018617 2090405 2020C00 5000000 0 0 0 0

3594918: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

3594938: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

3594958: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FD0110DF

3594978: AB1234CD FFFFFFFE 0 6135AB88 6031E348 3594AB8 359484C 80000002

3594998: FD52E6E0 3085F3 65810800 C07 AC010000 FE2F0002 FD52E6E0 3085F3

35949B8: 65810800 4500007C 1BA0000 FE2F25D9 D552AD61 D93A38D1 800 45000064

35949D8: 25F0000 FF322449 D552AD61 D93A38D1 14140000 C07AC01 23F34 A79E0800

35949F8: 4500003C 8C5B0000 7F015441 AC100202 AC110101 800601F 300EA3C 61626364

3594A18: 65666768 696A6B6C 6D6E6F70 71727374 75767761 62636465 66676869 0

3594A38: 0 1 F 40008 C010102 3A544727 0 0

3594A58: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

========= Dump bp->next = 3594AB8 ======================

35949B8: 65810800 4500007C 1BA0000 FE2F25D9 D552AD61 D93A38D1 800 45000064

35949D8: 25F0000 FF322449 D552AD61 D93A38D1 14140000 C07AC01 23F34 A79E0800

35949F8: 4500003C 8C5B0000 7F015441 AC100202 AC110101 800601F 300EA3C 61626364

3594A18: 65666768 696A6B6C 6D6E6F70 71727374 75767761 62636465 66676869 0

3594A38: 0 1 F 40008 C010102 3A544727 0 0

3594A58: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

3594A78: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

3594A98: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FD0110DF

3594AB8: AB1234CD FFFFFFFE 0 6135AB88 6031E348 3594BF8 359498C 8000008C

3594AD8: 1 0 AFACEFAD 0 10001 0 0 61D18F2C

3594AF8: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

3594B18: 0 0 0 FF FFFF0000 C07AC01 23F34 A79E0800

3594B38: 4500003C 8C5D0000 7F01543F AC100202 AC110101 8005E1F 300EC3C 61626364

3594B58: 65666768 696A6B6C 6D6E6F70 71727374 75767761 62636465 66676869 F2B0601

3594B78: 4018617 2090405 2060100 5000000 0 0 0 0

3594B98: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

========== Dump bp->previous = 359484C =====================

359474C: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30

359476C: 85F36590 23F34 A79E0800 4500003C 8C5E0000 7F015406 AC100202 AC10013A

359478C: 8005D1F 300ED3C 61626364 65666768 696A6B6C 6D6E6F70 71727374 75767761

35947AC: 62636465 66676869 F2B0601 4018617 2090405 2030A00 5000000 0

35947CC: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

35947EC: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

359480C: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

359482C: 0 0 FD0110DF AB1234CD FFFFFFFE 0 6135AB88 6031E348

359484C: 3594978 359470C 8000008C 1 0 AFACEFAD 0 10001

359486C: 0 0 61D18CC0 0 0 0 0 0

359488C: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FFFF

35948AC: FFFFFFFF 9027E5 71880806 10800 6040001 9027E5 7188AC10 6ACA0000

35948CC: 0 AC1001CA 0 0 0 0 E30 33020100

35948EC: 2010030 15301306 F2B0601 4018617 2090405 2020C00 5000000 0

359490C: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

359492C: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

============================================

%Software-forced reload

Queued messages:

00:05:11: %SYS-3-LOGGER_FLUSHING: System pausing to ensure console debugging output.

00:05:06: validblock_diagnose, code = 1

00:05:06:

current memory block, bp = 0x3594978,

memory pool type is I/O

00:05:06: data check, ptr = 0x35949A0

00:05:06:

next memory block, bp = 0x3594AB8,

memory pool type is I/O

00:05:06: data check, ptr = 0x3594AE0

00:05:06:

previous memory block, bp = 0x3594838,

memory pool type is I/O

00:05:06: data check, ptr = 0x3594860

00:05:10: %SYS-3-OVERRUN: Block overrun at 3594978 (red zone 65810800)

-Traceback= 60360798 60363388 60364458 603646A0 6035336C 60353358

00:05:10: %SYS-6-MTRACE: mallocfree: addr, pc

62146950,6036CC58 62146950,3000003A 62146950,6036CD88 62146950,6036CC58

62146950,3000003A 62146950,6036CD88 62146950,6036CC58 62146950,3000003A

00:05:10: %SYS-6-MTRACE: mallocfree: addr, pc

62146950,6036CD88 61C91E30,5000004C 61C91EF0,602D9C30 61C91E30,602D9C30

61CB5178,5000004E 61CB523C,602D9C30 61CB5178,602D9C30 61BAEE24,60372AC8

00:05:10: %SYS-6-BLKINFO: Corrupted redzone blk 3594978, words 2, alloc 6031E348, InUse, dealloc C07, rfcnt FD52E6E0

-Traceback= 6035E404 603607AC 60363388 60364458 603646A0 6035336C 60353358

00:05:10: %SYS-6-MEMDUMP: 0x3594978: 0xAB1234CD 0xFFFFFFFE 0x0 0x6135AB88

00:05:10: %SYS-6-MEMDUMP: 0x3594988: 0x6031E348 0x3594AB8 0x359484C 0x80000002

00:05:10: %SYS-6-MEMDUMP: 0x3594998: 0xFD52E6E0 0x3085F3 0x0 0x0

=== Flushing messages (01:05:12 CET Mon Mar 1 1993) ===

Queued messages:

00:05:12: %SYS-3-LOGGER_FLUSHING: System pausing to ensure console debugging output.

00:05:12: %SYS-3-LOGGER_FLUSHED: System was paused for 00:00:01 to ensure console debugging output.

No fault history 0xFFFFFFFF. Need 11.1 (2) or higher ROM

*** System received a Software forced crash ***

signal= 0x17, code= 0x24, context= 0x61a98830

PC = 0x6037bf74, Cause = 0x420, Status Reg = 0x34018002

System Bootstrap, Version 11.1(20)AA2, EARLY DEPLOYMENT RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)

oopyright (c) 1999 by cisco Systems, Inc.

  • Other Network Infrastructure Subjects
1 REPLY
New Member

Re: DUMP MEM ERROR

You get the same results with newer code? This core dump says "System Bootstrap, Version 11.1(20)AA2, EARLY DEPLOYMENT RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)" which is pretty old. I would test with 12.1 or 12.2 code and if the results are identical, perhaps its a memory or hardware issue. It will be difficult to troubleshoot here.

261
Views
0
Helpful
1
Replies