Cisco Support Community
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. If you'd prefer to explore, try our test area to get started. And see here for current known issues.

New Member



could you pls explain why the ethernet minimum frame size is 64 or 60 bytes..What happens to the frame with less than 60 bytes size..?

thanks in advance


  • Other Network Infrastructure Subjects
New Member

Re: ethernet

it has to be divisible by 32, like 1024, 512


Re: ethernet


The minimum Ethernet frame size is 64bytes. Any frames less this is known as a 'Runt'.

Runt's in most cases are caused by excessive collisions which occurr on a shared Ethernet segment. Runts are always discarded.

Take a look at the following links:



Ajaz Nawaz

please remember to rate any useful post

Re: ethernet

hi thomas,

as per ieee 802.3 standard frame less than 64-bytes are normally not allow... and frames less than 64-bytes are known as runts...

you can have more detail on this link:

rate this posst if it helps




Re: ethernet


Any ethernet packet sent out that is less than 64 bytes should be "padded" by the driver or higher level protocols to that size. Padding is additional, non-meaninful data that is discarded. Usually, because there can be a checksum over the whole packet, zeros are the padding of choice.

Ethernet requires this minimum size to ensure that a collision is detected reliably. As you probably know, ethernet is really a serial media, in this case meaning that one (encoded) bit at a time is sent out on the wire. So the sixty four bytes take a definite "length of time" to transmit.

Moreover, the collision detection only occurs within this first 64 bytes. This size and collision-detection mechanism are tied to the physical size of the network - by size, I mean, how long the cable runs are. Excessively long cable runs can cause collisions to fall outside the 64 byte timing window, which is why observing the cable-length limits is so important.

There is an "interpacket gap", when the media is supposed to be quiet, of a certain size (amount of time, number of bits), also related to the network "diameter" (cable length[s]).

Note that introducing switches and full-duplex operation radically change certain aspects of this - if all is working correctly, there will never be a collision on a full duplex link. Because there can't be a collision, you could in theory get away with longer cabling runs. Your network can be larger, because the switch re-generates the packets anew if and when it sends them out.

Nevertheless, in practice, the packet size limits and cable length limits still apply (if you want reliable networking, that is), with certain notable exceptions (specifically, certain trunking encapsulations increase the maximum packet size a small amount; certain specific gigabit interfaces can transmit and receive "giant" frames).

There's an O'Reilly book, "Ethernet: The Definitive Guide", by Spurgeon, that might answer any other 'low level' detail questions you have.