"A multicast storm occurs when STP fails (for whatever reason) to do it's job of blocking ports on redundant uplinks hence allowing loops to form. Therefore in the event of a multicast storm one quick way to stop it would be to manually remove one of the two uplinks from each edge switch stack to the core switch stack in effect manually breaking the loop."
This sounds right to me but I'd like some further opinions. Also, on a more general note, what else can one do if one experiences a multicast storm to isolate the source of the problem?
If STP fails then yes there is the potential for not just multicast but also braodcast storms within your network so the above is a fair statement.
As to what else you can do, some switches support broadcast/multicast storm control which works on thresholds. Attached is a document for the 4500 switch which explains this in more detail - note that the 4500 is not the only switch with these features.
Thanks for this Jon. I'll check out the link as well.
I'm just curious if people agree that you could just remove one of the redundant uplinks (Ie: Literally yank out one of the two uplink cables on each edge switch stack.) to solve the problem? (at least temporarily)
Hi everyone, I would like to thank you in advance for any help you can provide a newcomer like myself!
Im studying the 100-105 book by Odom and am currently on the topic of Port security. I purchased a used 2960 and I'm trying to follow a...
While deploying a number of 18xx/2802/3802 model access points (APs), which run AP-COS as their operating platform. It can be observed on some occasions that while many of their access points were able to join the fabric WLC withou...
I am going to design and build an LAN network under a tunnel underground with long distance between the switches.
I will have 2 Catalyst switches and 8 Industrial IE3000, and they will be connected with fiber.
For now I am planning on use Layer-2 s...