Let's say we have a Cisco 7500 series box with GEIP line card (Gigabit Ethernet Interface Processor), and a 1 Gbps WAN link (layer 1 is DWDM) connected to it.
"The GEIP is based on the versatile interface processor 2-50 (VIP2-50) architecture and hence exhibits similar data throughput characteristics. The GEIP has a maximum aggregate throughput of 400 Mbps and a Layer 3 packet switching performance of about 110 Kpps, full duplex."
What maximum aggregate throughput means, at all? Aggregate because it's full-duplex? (200 Mbps in each direction)?
For example, if 1 Gbps link is utilised 100%, that means 1 GB rx + 1 GB tx (full duplex) = 2 GB of traffic, our 7500 box will just handle 400 Mbps? That's 20% of the paid bandwidth because aggregate link throughput is 2 Gbps and hardware throughput is just 400 Mbps?
So I am still assuming right, paying 1 Gbps WAN link in such a setup is waste of money:
there are a backplane capacity limitations and line card data throughput limitations, even with the GEIP+ (800Mbps) cards. Theoretically and practically you can't get what you're paying for! Why is it called Gigabit Ethernet Interface Processor? If Top-of the line box (7500 series) can't handle it, how it works with 2600s and GE modules there? I love marketing
7500 was top of the line in 1996. It's supposed to be able to connect to and route between a wide variety of low to moderate speed medias like sync serial, async serial, token ring, ethernet, fast and gigabit ethernet, ATM, SONET, FDDI, IBM's ESCON, TDM voice, etc. I think it even used to have a 100VG AnyLAN interface. Its backplane is limited to about 1Gbps (1Gbps per side of the box on 7513) and you're just not going to get any more than that. That was the best of the technology at the time; even the 1Gbps speed is the "upgraded" speed.
The only 2600 that can take a Gigabit Ethernet module is the 2691. It's the very highest-end model of 2600. Also consider that if you stuffed the rest of that 2691 full of interfaces and filled them all with traffic aimed out of the NM-1GE, you still couldn't fill it up, because the rest of the interfaces aren't nearly gigabit speed.
The reason a GE module makes sense for the 7500 series is because the routers are capable of doing well over 100Mbps. So there's a large advantage to a GE module relative to an FE module, even if 100% utilization isn't possible. Given that the bandwidth difference between successive Ethernet flavors has historically been 10x, this type of thing is fairly common. Consider how many low-end routers have FE interfaces but can't route at 100Mbps -- they can do well over 10Mbps, so FE interfaces make sense.
Hi everyone, I would like to thank you in advance for any help you can provide a newcomer like myself!
Im studying the 100-105 book by Odom and am currently on the topic of Port security. I purchased a used 2960 and I'm trying to follow a...
While deploying a number of 18xx/2802/3802 model access points (APs), which run AP-COS as their operating platform. It can be observed on some occasions that while many of their access points were able to join the fabric WLC withou...
I am going to design and build an LAN network under a tunnel underground with long distance between the switches.
I will have 2 Catalyst switches and 8 Industrial IE3000, and they will be connected with fiber.
For now I am planning on use Layer-2 s...