Cisco Support Community
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. And see here for current known issues.

New Member

Going beyond RFC 1918 class A address space ?

I need a second private class A - what is the best choice ? So I'm looking for another class A currently not routable on the Internet. Suggestions ?

Other RFC 1918 class B's and C's are not possible - I want to make a secondary overlay for my existing 10/8.

New Member

Re: Going beyond RFC 1918 class A address space ?

Would it not be best to further subnet your /8 network to mask or something then you will have loads of subnets!!

If this is not possible if you have a firewall hiding your internal addresses from external users/ the internet then you could use any subnet you like


New Member

Re: Going beyond RFC 1918 class A address space ?

My 10/8 is already subnetted (VLSM multilevel core and summarization) over a couple of thousand (!)sites. What is the next best step after RFC1918 ?


Re: Going beyond RFC 1918 class A address space ?

There really isn't one. Addresses not allocated now will most likely be allocated someday. Then you'll be in trouble. The "best" thing to do may be some IP restructuring to increase efficiency. There are over 16 million IP addresses in 10/8 -- are you using even 1 million of them right now?

Another option is to request public IP addresses from an RIR (RIPE if you're in the UK). I don't believe that advertising IP addresses to the Internet is a requirement for getting an allocation, so you could explain that you're running out of private IP's to use and potentially be allocated a public block. But if your actual utilization of the RFC1918 blocks is low due to inefficient subnetting, you may run into trouble trying to justify the need for a public netblock.

CreatePlease to create content