This is not true by any means, when running SRM the NON-DR supervisor is in an active state but with all VLAN's etc in down state, there is no routing info, arp tables etc so its not a stateful failover feature and as such is not a "live" on the network.
We run this in all distribution and core switches.
DRM and SRM will maintain Layer 3 forwarding entries in the hardware-forwarding table (a function of the Cisco Catalyst OS High Availability feature). The difference is that DRM employs two active routers in the chassis and the SRM employs only one router. So SRM requires a routing table recalculation in the software that DRM does not, but neither has a direct effect on the failover time for Layer 3 traffic.
Thanks for the info. All signs show that SRM is configured correctly. What I am seeing is if the MSFC on SUP(A) goes down, the MSFC on SUP(B) takes over. However since the actual SUP(A) is still up SUP(B) stays in a down state. What I think is happening is that although the MSFC on SUP(B) is now primary no traffic is forwarded because his SUP is in a down state. Does this make sense?
We are pleased to announce availability of Beta software for 16.6.3.
16.6.3 will be the second rebuild on the 16.6 release train targeted
towards Catalyst 9500/9400/9300/3850/3650 switching platforms. We are
looking for early feedback from customers befor...
Introduction Featured Speakers Luis Espejel is the Telecommunications
Manager of IENova, an Oil & Gas company. Currently he works with Cisco
IOS® and Cisco IOS XE platforms, and NX to some extent. He has also
worked as a Senior Engineer with the Routing P...
In this session you can learn more about Layer 3 multicast and the best
practices to identify possible threats and take security measures. It
provides an overview of basic multicast, the best security practices for
use of this technology, and recommendati...