Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements
Webcast-Catalyst9k
New Member

HSSI Line Protocol Issues..

Below is a output from the known working router (3600). I don't have a problem with this router but I need this router replaced with a Cisco 6509 Multilayer switch with a HSSI card. The problem I have is when I swap the connections for the 6509 from the 3600, I get line line protocol despite having the exact same config as the 3600. Why doesn't the same config parameters work on the 6509. From my experience I have noticed that line protocol issues usually deal with HArdware and Cabling. I am leading to the right path?

Hssi0/1 is up, line protocol is up

Hardware is M1T-HSSI-B

Interface is unnumbered. Using address of FastEthernet0/0

MTU 4470 bytes, BW 45045 Kbit, DLY 200 usec,

reliability 255/255, txload 2/255, rxload 38/255

Encapsulation HDLC, crc 32, loopback not set

Keepalive set (10 sec)

Last input 00:00:00, output 00:00:00, output hang never

Last clearing of "show interface" counters 1d1h

Queueing strategy: fifo

Output queue 0/40, 5 drops; input queue 0/75, 0 drops

5 minute input rate 6831000 bits/sec, 754 packets/sec

5 minute output rate 365000 bits/sec, 336 packets/sec

8952007 packets input, 2216731701 bytes, 0 no buffer

Received 17668 broadcasts, 1 runts, 2 giants, 0 throttles

0 parity

10 input errors, 9 CRC, 0 frame, 1 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort

7106905 packets output, 1538610945 bytes, 0 underruns

0 output errors, 0 applique, 1 interface resets

0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out

3 carrier transitions LC=down CA=up TM=down LB=down TA=up LA=down

2 REPLIES
Silver

Re: HSSI Line Protocol Issues..

What type PA are you installing in your Catalyst? Can you also put the configuration (interface specific) that you are trying to apply to this PA that is not working?

Regards,

Don

New Member

Re: HSSI Line Protocol Issues..

Don,

I was checking with a coworker and he stated that there is a "revision b" PA that is a non faulty version. apparently the version prior (I would assume Rev. A) had some issues. I am going to check the PA out today to see if in fact it is the old revison.

Thanks,

Brandon

75
Views
0
Helpful
2
Replies
CreatePlease to create content