If HSRP for IPX is not needed. How about redundant LAN routers?
If HSRP is not needed for IPX because the hosts will automatically find an alternate route, then is there any issues with IPX routing loops or duplicate RIP/SAP advertisements if two routers are used on the same LAN, which are both connected to a different LAN. For example, if a catalyst 6509 with 2 MSFC cards is between 2 LANs for routing purposes from one LAN to the other, and HSRP is enabled for the IP traffic, then what should be done about redundancy for the IPX traffic? If IPX is enabled on both MSFC routers, with the same route to the secondary LAN, will there be any issues with IPX routing loops or duplicate RIP/SAP packets?
We have 3 identical switches configured by someone else and would like to claim some of the Gigabit ports(G1/G2/G3/G4) for use on servers. When we try to change the wiring and configuration, we run in to connectivity issues. Attached is a des...
This is actually a pretty cool feature, i didn't even know it existed until I was looking for a solution to advertise a subnet (prefix in BGP talk), only if a certain condition existed. This is exactly what conditional advertisements does
j ai une question j ai achete un routeur cisco 887VA-k9 , je le configuré avec la configuration ci- dessous
si je le lier avec mon pc portable sur l un de ses ports directement ça marche toute est bien ( la connexion internet + m...