Traffic from the 'DMZ' on the Firewall is going out to the .1 Router. Then, policy routing tells it to go to the .2 Router. That part is fine. Now, when the response comes back from the .2 Router, the routing table says send it to the .1 Router. The .1 Router has a route that says it needs to go to the Firewall. The problem is that it never gets to the Firewall. The .1 Router's log shows the traffic coming through, but the Firewall's log doesn't show that it receives it. The reason we don't have the .2 Router talk directly with the Firewall is because the .2 Router is owned by someone else, and we want all their traffic to go to the .1 Router, where we can control where it goes.
Any ideas on what is happening to the return traffic?
This is actually a pretty cool feature, i didn't even know it existed until I was looking for a solution to advertise a subnet (prefix in BGP talk), only if a certain condition existed. This is exactly what conditional advertisements does
j ai une question j ai achete un routeur cisco 887VA-k9 , je le configuré avec la configuration ci- dessous
si je le lier avec mon pc portable sur l un de ses ports directement ça marche toute est bien ( la connexion internet + m...
Attached policy provides CLI access to the Cisco 4G router over text messaging. Two files are in the attached .tar file:
2. PDF with instructions on how to load and use the .tcl file.