The problem is that a device will send an ARP request and it will bind only one MAC address to the IP address so only one host will be used, or the ARP entry will change according to who sends a packet thereby destroying session integrity. It's not a switch issue, rather an IP stack issue.
If you want to load balance in any sensible fashion, a Content switch such as the 11xxx range will be a better solution. If you need any assistance contact firstname.lastname@example.org and I will assist.
This document gives several answers on frequently asked questions for PFRv3 channel state behavior.
Q1: What are all the channel operational states from a BR (border role) perspective and what are the rules/conditions to be in each st...
The need was to reach an host inside a LAN through a VPN connection managed by the LAN gateway (Cisco 1921).
The LAN gateway performs NAT and there was a dedicate nat rule for the host i wanted to reach through VPN.
I couldn't connect to the hos...
We have 3 identical switches configured by someone else and would like to claim some of the Gigabit ports(G1/G2/G3/G4) for use on servers. When we try to change the wiring and configuration, we run in to connectivity issues. Attached is a des...