"Standard" OSPF--OSPFv2--actually doesn't run IPv6--you have to run OSPFv3, which is a completely seperate protocol, process, etc. You can redistribute between the two, but the OSPF working group in the IETF has pointedly decided that there's no reason to provide any other mechanism for migrating from OSPF with IPv4 to OSPF for IPv6 other than ships in the night or redistribution at some edge. There are other changes to OSPFv3 that don't relate to IPv6 directly, as well.
IS-IS carries both protocols in the same process/packets, although it still runs seperate SPF trees for them, etc.
So, a lot is going to depend on whether you prefer implementing IPv6 routing in a seperate protocol, or in the same protocol, with a different database.
We are pleased to announce availability of Beta software for 16.6.3.
16.6.3 will be the second rebuild on the 16.6 release train targeted
towards Catalyst 9500/9400/9300/3850/3650 switching platforms. We are
looking for early feedback from customers befor...
Introduction Featured Speakers Luis Espejel is the Telecommunications
Manager of IENova, an Oil & Gas company. Currently he works with Cisco
IOS® and Cisco IOS XE platforms, and NX to some extent. He has also
worked as a Senior Engineer with the Routing P...
In this session you can learn more about Layer 3 multicast and the best
practices to identify possible threats and take security measures. It
provides an overview of basic multicast, the best security practices for
use of this technology, and recommendati...