Is it legtimate to bridge between 2 VLAN's on a Catalyst 3548-XL
We are deploying an OEM product called Big-IP that functions something like Cisco Local Director. It is used for server load balancing and needs to act as bridge between the client and a backend VLAN housing a server farm. To conserve hardware, I'd like to take a Catalyst 3524XL-EN (or a 3548XL-EN)and split it into 2 VLAN's. Is there a problem bridging between the 2 VLAN's? i.e. Does the VLAN 1 side of the switch learn everything about what's in VLAN 2 exclusively via the bridge (and vice-versa)?
Re: Is it legtimate to bridge between 2 VLAN's on a Catalyst 354
There are no real problems linking 2 VLANs using a bridge. You have to be careful with your spanning-tree to avoid having ports into blocking state while they should not (this due to the fact that the 2 VLANs are merged in one big VLAN). You also have to be careful about the spanning-tree diameter. Regarding "learning", MAC addresses existing in VLAN1 may be learned in VLAN2 as the 2 VLANs are being merged by the bridge.
We are pleased to announce availability of Beta software for 16.6.3.
16.6.3 will be the second rebuild on the 16.6 release train targeted
towards Catalyst 9500/9400/9300/3850/3650 switching platforms. We are
looking for early feedback from customers befor...
Introduction Featured Speakers Luis Espejel is the Telecommunications
Manager of IENova, an Oil & Gas company. Currently he works with Cisco
IOS® and Cisco IOS XE platforms, and NX to some extent. He has also
worked as a Senior Engineer with the Routing P...
In this session you can learn more about Layer 3 multicast and the best
practices to identify possible threats and take security measures. It
provides an overview of basic multicast, the best security practices for
use of this technology, and recommendati...