Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements

Attention: The Community will be in read-only mode on 12/14/2017 from 12:00 am pacific to 11:30 am.

During this time you will only be able to see content. Other interactions such as posting, replying to questions, or marking content as helpful will be disabled for few hours.

We apologize for the inconvenience while we perform important updates to the Community.

New Member

ISDN Adtran vs c2503

We are trying to carry out a connection ISDN among an equipment 2503 and a modem adtran ISU 2X64; what we desire in carrying out a link to 128kbps and the problem is that alone we achieve to raise it to 64kbps. I enclose I send them the configuración of the equipment and diagram of connection

C3660---------ISU2X64-----------Net ISDN------------C2503.

ser v.35 BRI

C3660#

interface Serial2/1

description Enlace Prueba a Puebla

bandwidth 128

ip address 10.72.64.2 255.255.255.252

encapsulation ppp

dialer in-band

dialer map ip 10.72.64.1 name Metepec broadcast 2193452

dialer-group 1

no fair-queue

pulse-time 1

C2503#.

interface BRI0

description enlace prueba Puebla

ip address 10.72.64.1 255.255.255.252

no ip directed-broadcast

encapsulation ppp

bandwidth 128

dialer idle-timeout 300

dialer map ip 10.72.64.2 name c3660 broadcast 2190580

dialer-group 1

no fair-queue

ppp quality 20

ppp multilink

5 REPLIES

Re: ISDN Adtran vs c2503

To use multilink PPP you also need to issue the following command on the BRI interface:

dialer load-threshold 2 either

You need this to activate the second B-channel when the traffic reaches a certain level. When you pick a low number, the 2nd link should remain active almost all the time.

New Member

Re: ISDN Adtran vs c2503

Very well, if we want to initiate the conecction to 128, without expecting a threshold of traffic in the interface; that we should configure. On the other hand knows of an reestriccion or configuration specifies for the modem adtran, since this conexion is done well to 128 among equipment cisco; and with the modem alone we reach link of 64kbps

Bronze

Re: ISDN Adtran vs c2503

You can try any of these options on the cisco to bring up 2 links ASAP:

dialer load-threshold 1

ppp multilink link min 2

Not sure about configuration options for the Adtran.

New Member

Re: ISDN Adtran vs c2503

Thanks by the Tip, already we test an option and i looking that really the call is generated to connect the second canal B, however itself is not achieved to establish the conexion. I enclose the result of a debug, that can comment me about?

20:39:35: CC_CHAN_GetIdleChanbri: dsl 0

20:39:35: Found idle channel B2

20:39:35: ISDN BR0: received HOST_PROCEEDING call_id 0x8103

20:39:35: ISDN BR0: received HOST_ALERTING call_id 0x8103

20:39:35: ISDN BR0: DEV_CALL_PROGRESSING: modem 3A bchan 1, call_id 8103, cause

0

20:39:35: ISDN BR0: HOST_ALERTING: VOICE ERROR 3A: bchan 1, call id 8103

20:39:35: ISDN BR0: received HOST_CONNECT call_id 0x8103

20:39:35: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0:2, changed state to up

20:39:35: %ISDN-6-CONNECT: Interface BRI0:2 is now connected to 2193452

20:39:36: ISDN BR0: Event: Connected to 2193452 on B2 at 64 Kb/s

20:39:38: ISDN BR0: received HOST_DISCONNECT call_id 0x8103

20:39:38: ISDN BR0: Event: Call to was hung up.

20:39:38: ISDN BR0: process_disc_ack(): call id 0x8103, ces 1, call type DATA

20:39:38: %ISDN-6-DISCONNECT: Interface BRI0:2 disconnected from 2193452 , call

lasted 2 seconds

20:39:38: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0:2, changed state to down

20:39:38: ISDN BR0: received HOST_DISCONNECT_ACK call_id 0x8103

20:39:38: ISDN BR0: HOST_DISCONNECT_ACK: call type is DATA

Bronze

Re: ISDN Adtran vs c2503

It looks like the remote Adtran initiated the disconnect; you can have a look at "debug isdn q931" and "debug ppp neg" to confirm, but otherwise you should check the config of the Adtran to see why it's disconnecting.

177
Views
0
Helpful
5
Replies
CreatePlease to create content