I wonder why you still have 'ip route 192.168.71.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.71.4' configured on Router A when this route is a directly connected network. The same case with Router B. Afaik, for directly connected networks, you don't need to add it in the routing table.
The serial interfaces could be using the default 'per-destination' load-balancing. Check if the serial interface is configured for fast-switching ('ip route-cache' command). To utilize both links at the same time, use per-packet load-balancing by disabling fast-switching. For more information on per-destination and per-packet load-balancing, check out the following link:
Warning: Turning of fast switching (no ip route-cache) forces all packets to be process switched, which greatly increases CPU consumption and forwarding delays. Instead, you should use "Cisco Express Forwarding" and specify "per packet" load sharing. CEF consumes lots of RAM, but RAM can be added while CPU cycles are limited.
We have 3 identical switches configured by someone else and would like to claim some of the Gigabit ports(G1/G2/G3/G4) for use on servers. When we try to change the wiring and configuration, we run in to connectivity issues. Attached is a des...
This is actually a pretty cool feature, i didn't even know it existed until I was looking for a solution to advertise a subnet (prefix in BGP talk), only if a certain condition existed. This is exactly what conditional advertisements does
j ai une question j ai achete un routeur cisco 887VA-k9 , je le configuré avec la configuration ci- dessous
si je le lier avec mon pc portable sur l un de ses ports directement ça marche toute est bien ( la connexion internet + m...