I currently have implemented two T1 Private Line clear channel IP T's to the Internet, running BGP Protocol. There are two routers which terminate the two T's, and two Cisco 2600's used for loadbalancing the outbound traffic. Behind the two load balancers we have a PIX firewall which is creating our VPN connection to the other location. We are currently trying to get bandwidth of 3mb both outbound and inbound. We are currntly getting load balancing outbound but not inbound. The access routers that our edge routers point two are in two geographically different areas for redundancy, and to make matters even more complicated, we have implemented voice over IP on one of the routers. Only way I know of is to add a third T and have two T's going to one access router, so we can bind the two T's, and leave the third T for redundancy. Do you have any idea how we will be able to get per packet load balancing on the one router and still be able to run voice over IP effectively? I am faced with performance issues, related to the fact that I need the 3mbps full duplex comunication...
Will enabling per packet load balancing in this case cause performance issues with voice over IP, due to out of order packet sequence numbers and latency. Obviously the two T's are going to the same access router on my ISP's backbone, but there still the internet in between.
This is actually a pretty cool feature, i didn't even know it existed until I was looking for a solution to advertise a subnet (prefix in BGP talk), only if a certain condition existed. This is exactly what conditional advertisements does
j ai une question j ai achete un routeur cisco 887VA-k9 , je le configuré avec la configuration ci- dessous
si je le lier avec mon pc portable sur l un de ses ports directement ça marche toute est bien ( la connexion internet + m...
Attached policy provides CLI access to the Cisco 4G router over text messaging. Two files are in the attached .tar file:
2. PDF with instructions on how to load and use the .tcl file.