Hi, I've got two Cisco 3620s using 2 E1 channels back-to-back, that I want to load balance over. I seem to have a choice of per-destination or per-packet. Am I right in thinking that per-packet is very CPU intensive and that the 3620 might not cope and that I should use fast-switching (ip route-cache) and use per destination? If the CPU was not an issue, when would per-packet be prefereable to per-destination?
This is actually a pretty cool feature, i didn't even know it existed until I was looking for a solution to advertise a subnet (prefix in BGP talk), only if a certain condition existed. This is exactly what conditional advertisements does
j ai une question j ai achete un routeur cisco 887VA-k9 , je le configuré avec la configuration ci- dessous
si je le lier avec mon pc portable sur l un de ses ports directement ça marche toute est bien ( la connexion internet + m...
Attached policy provides CLI access to the Cisco 4G router over text messaging. Two files are in the attached .tar file:
2. PDF with instructions on how to load and use the .tcl file.