I am not sure that I fully understand your question. One VLAN represents one broadcast domain. In the traditional way of understanding it, a subnet is also defined as a broadcast domain. If you want to treat the subnet in the traditional way such that members of one subnet can not communicate directly with members of the other subnet but must go through a router to get between subnets, then no you can not have two subnets in the same VLAN.
On the other hand if you are asking if it is possible to configure addresses from two different subnets within one VLAN then it is possible to configure it. But the end stations would be able to communicate directly with each other without needing to go through a router. So yes you could do it, but the results might not be what you want.
This document gives several answers on frequently asked questions for PFRv3 channel state behavior.
Q1: What are all the channel operational states from a BR (border role) perspective and what are the rules/conditions to be in each st...
The need was to reach an host inside a LAN through a VPN connection managed by the LAN gateway (Cisco 1921).
The LAN gateway performs NAT and there was a dedicate nat rule for the host i wanted to reach through VPN.
I couldn't connect to the hos...
We have 3 identical switches configured by someone else and would like to claim some of the Gigabit ports(G1/G2/G3/G4) for use on servers. When we try to change the wiring and configuration, we run in to connectivity issues. Attached is a des...