CEF can load share on a per-packet or per-flow basis over equal-cost links, while MLPPP can bond several links into a single virtual link. MLPPP works at a lower level and is therefore better at dividing load evenly, but it can cause higher CPU utiliztion on some platforms depending on the bandwidth of the links being bonded.
I think the best bet is usually to try MLPPP first if possible, and revert to per-packet CEF if MLPPP causes CPU usage problems.
This is actually a pretty cool feature, i didn't even know it existed until I was looking for a solution to advertise a subnet (prefix in BGP talk), only if a certain condition existed. This is exactly what conditional advertisements does
j ai une question j ai achete un routeur cisco 887VA-k9 , je le configuré avec la configuration ci- dessous
si je le lier avec mon pc portable sur l un de ses ports directement ça marche toute est bien ( la connexion internet + m...
Attached policy provides CLI access to the Cisco 4G router over text messaging. Two files are in the attached .tar file:
2. PDF with instructions on how to load and use the .tcl file.