I want to route all traffic received from a subnet (for example, 192.168.10.0/24) through a particular interface (FastEthernet0/1). For this reason, I've implemented a route map with "set ip next-hop":
interface FastEthernet0/0 ip address 192.168.200.1 255.255.255.0
! interface FastEthernet0/1 ip address 192.168.250.1 255.255.255.0 ! interface FastEthernet1/0 ip address 192.168.100.2 255.255.255.0 ip policy route-map MAPA_RUTA ! ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.200.2 ip route 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.100.1 ip route 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.100.1 ! access-list 100 permit ip 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.255 any ! route-map MAPA_RUTA permit 10 match ip address 100 set ip next-hop 192.168.250.2
But I have a problem. If the FastEthernet0/1 goes down, I don't want the traffic from 192.168.10.0/24 to be routed though FastEthernet0/0 (as indicated by the default route). Is there any alternative to "set ip next-hop" to do it? I've tried "set ip default next-hop" but I have a similar problem.
Yes, I want it be dropped. I don't want this traffic to pass though the router attached to fa0/0. If there is no alternative to the "set ip next-hop" with route maps, I've thought to using an ACL in the fa0/0.
Hi everyone, I would like to thank you in advance for any help you can provide a newcomer like myself!
Im studying the 100-105 book by Odom and am currently on the topic of Port security. I purchased a used 2960 and I'm trying to follow a...
While deploying a number of 18xx/2802/3802 model access points (APs), which run AP-COS as their operating platform. It can be observed on some occasions that while many of their access points were able to join the fabric WLC withou...