cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
685
Views
0
Helpful
9
Replies

PPPoE L2TP

c.vergara
Level 1
Level 1

I ´m using a 7204 (12.2(15)T1) router for terminate PPPoE sessions, this is working fine. But i need to extend this ppp session through a L2TP tunnel from the same 7200 (LAC) until other router (LNS).

PPPoE Client-----7200(LAC)--------Router(LNS)

Is possible this solution ? If is affirmative which the configuration of the routers or any documentation about this ?

regards,

Carlos

9 Replies 9

zahmed
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

Carlos, I believe you need "L2TP Multihop" feature. Please check out the following:

http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/471/l2tp_multihop2.html

You could seach CCO for more on L2TP Multihop. Let me know if you meant something else.

~Zulfi

tepatel
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

Absolutely..you can do that..Here is the link which discuss the same scenerio.

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/794/pppoe_arch.html

Following config is tested and known to work for that scenerio,

PPPoE Client-----7200(LAC)--------Router(LNS)

On LAC 7200 terminating pvc 1/35

vpdn enable

vpdn search-order domain

!

vpdn-group 10

description to forward pppoe over l2tp to LNS

request-dialin

protocol l2tp

domain a@b.com

initiate-to ip 10.10.10.2 priority 1

no l2tp tunnel authentication

!

vpdn-group 4

accept-dialin

protocol pppoe

virtual-template 3

!

interface ATM4/0

no ip address

no atm ilmi-keepalive

pvc 1/35

protocol pppoe

!

interface Virtual-Template3

no ip address

ip mtu 1492

peer default ip address pool ADSL

ppp authentication pap

!

ip local pool ADSL x.x.x.x y.y.y.y

On LNS

vpdn-group 4

accept-dialin

protocol l2tp

virtual-template 1

terminate-from hostname c7200

lcp renegotiation on-mismatch

no l2tp tunnel authentication

!

interface Virtual-Template1

ip unnumbered FastEthernet0/1

peer default ip address pool ADSL

ppp authentication pap

!

ip local pool ADSL a.a.a.a y.y.y.y

Hi,

thanks for your help, this configuration is working fine, the other router was a Shasta and was necessary add l2tp tunnel authentication in boths ends.

A last question, Is possible leave the l2tp tunnel static (always on) ?

Carlos

I don't think so that you can have always on l2tp tunnel without users in it. Any special reason why you need it?

The customer needs to know if the tunnel can is always on, because the Shasta has the option static on the tunnel configuration.

We have this hidden command "l2tp tunnel nosession-timeout " that goes under VPDN group after selecting "protocol l2tp". See if this does the job for you.

~Zulfi

Hi,

Finally the command is "l2tp tunnel timeout no-session never" and must is on both end (LAC and LNS).

thanks for yous help.

Carlos

Needs to be on both ends since if the router is configured as a LAC, the default is 15 seconds. If the router is configured as an LNS, the default is 10 seconds.

http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122newft/122tcr/122tdr/drfisl2.htm#1141929

Thanks, Mak.

Hi,

yes was neccesary apply this command in boths end. The implementation is working fine.

thanks,

Carlos