Problems 2948G_L3 used as Traditional Layer 2 switch
I acquired 2 2948G_L3s, for which we had no use for other than as access switches in our lan. They were configured with all ports in bridge group 1, with spanning-tree disabled, except for 2 ports which form a port-channel uplink to a 6509.
I have had far more problems with these than with my 3548XL's. In an NT network we have users having PDC problems, slow transfer rates from servers, can't map drives, etc.
So my question is -
Assuming my configuration is as good as it will get to make these router/switches into traditional swithces, has anyone else had any issues with these similar to mine, and is this the best performance I can expect from the 2948_L3's in a layer 2 topology ?
P.S. BVI 1 is my management IP interface, and bridge
group 1 is my "vlan", does this make a difference ?
This is actually a pretty cool feature, i didn't even know it existed until I was looking for a solution to advertise a subnet (prefix in BGP talk), only if a certain condition existed. This is exactly what conditional advertisements does
j ai une question j ai achete un routeur cisco 887VA-k9 , je le configuré avec la configuration ci- dessous
si je le lier avec mon pc portable sur l un de ses ports directement ça marche toute est bien ( la connexion internet + m...
Attached policy provides CLI access to the Cisco 4G router over text messaging. Two files are in the attached .tar file:
2. PDF with instructions on how to load and use the .tcl file.