We have a Cisco 3640 router with two T1 interface and configured for BGP between two service providers and we have a cisco pix firewall behind the cisco router. Is there any automatic failover options available incase my cisco 3640 router crashes? Can i have one more cisco 3640 router with same configuration loaded as standy and make it active once the primary router crashes? Is there any equipment that can be placed in between the ISP Jack and the router which splits the connection to both the router and starts sending pockets to the standby router once the active router goes down like a Y cable?
The cleanest way to provide redundancy for your single router is to use a second router and put one T1 on each router. However, you need to examine your situation carefully first, as the router is far from the only single point of failure in your environment... you also need to worry about the hub/switch between the routers and firewall, the firewall, the hub/switch on the user side of the firewall, electrical power, and the physical diversity of your two T1 lines.
Unless you have already paid attention to these factors, your most likely cause of additional downtime is simultaneous failure of both of your T1 lines (which are probably in the same telco cable bundle under the streets between your building and the central office, if not all the way to your wall jacks).
After that, your most likely cause of failure is dead batteries in your UPS (you do have a UPS, if not, move power to the most likely cause of failure).
After that, your most likely cause of failure is human error. You do have processes and procedures in place to control who can change configurations and testing of those configuration changes before putting them into production???
It is very easy to spend a lot of money on redundancy, but you need to invest in planning and understanding to gain significant availabilty increases from the redundancy.
Thanks a lot for your mail. The best way to redudancy is moving the other internet to the other T1 line. Am i correct? I was of the impression that there will be some statefull failover option for the routers like the cisco pix firewall?.
If I read this email correctly, I assume that you use only one T1 for connectivity and the other for failover using BGP?
If that is in fact the case, you might look into using HSRP over iBGP between two routers. Each router with a single T1 installed and and crossed over for connectivity. We do this same scenario using multiple DS3's and at every aspect, we have a redundant link, switch and interface. The only thing that is lost, is that there is very little load sharing using BGP.
Hi everyone, I would like to thank you in advance for any help you can provide a newcomer like myself!
Im studying the 100-105 book by Odom and am currently on the topic of Port security. I purchased a used 2960 and I'm trying to follow a...
While deploying a number of 18xx/2802/3802 model access points (APs), which run AP-COS as their operating platform. It can be observed on some occasions that while many of their access points were able to join the fabric WLC withou...
I am going to design and build an LAN network under a tunnel underground with long distance between the switches.
I will have 2 Catalyst switches and 8 Industrial IE3000, and they will be connected with fiber.
For now I am planning on use Layer-2 s...