I notice you use the "ip next-hop verify-availability" command in your route-map. This is not really meant for point-to-point links but for broadcast links. Can you remove that statement and see if it makes a difference.
Harold Ritter Sr. Technical Leader CCIE 4168 (R&S, SP) email@example.com México móvil: +52 1 55 8312 4915 Cisco México Paseo de la Reforma 222 Piso 19 Cuauhtémoc, Juárez Ciudad de México, 06600 México
what are you trying to with that access-list . As I see, both source and destination address are in same network. So this traffic doesn't reach to the router's Serial interface. If you are trying to establish communication between overlapping networks on different sites, you have to use NAT.
i want use this router whitch had this route-map was to manage some packets from 188.8.131.52 (such as 184.108.40.206/24) to 220.127.116.11 (such as 18.104.22.168/16),the source and destination address is so many subnets,so i want use the 22.214.171.124/22 match all. so i can use this map on all my wan interface to manage the 126.96.36.199/24 188.8.131.52 /24 ...and other source subnets packets to 184.108.40.206/24 220.127.116.11/24...des subnets,through next-hop router .it is what i want to do! for so many address and so many interface i only want use one rout-map.
We have 3 identical switches configured by someone else and would like to claim some of the Gigabit ports(G1/G2/G3/G4) for use on servers. When we try to change the wiring and configuration, we run in to connectivity issues. Attached is a des...
This is actually a pretty cool feature, i didn't even know it existed until I was looking for a solution to advertise a subnet (prefix in BGP talk), only if a certain condition existed. This is exactly what conditional advertisements does
j ai une question j ai achete un routeur cisco 887VA-k9 , je le configuré avec la configuration ci- dessous
si je le lier avec mon pc portable sur l un de ses ports directement ça marche toute est bien ( la connexion internet + m...