I have a customer who has a 1720 with wic1 connected Frame to Sprint Using Public address set 1, If that fails there is a 2nd wic with an ISDN bri connected to ISP 2, I can get the ISDN to failover the Frame connection using weighted statics to each ISP gateway BUT I don't know how to get the secondary NAT pool to kickin with the failover. I don't think seperate route maps with separate pools will work due to the source and destination IP addressing won't change, only the intermediate routing would.
Re: scenario, Dual Nat for Dual ISP's, No BGP Peering
Hi. It is easy. You can use route-map to match the interface to decide which pool to use. From http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/iosw/ioft/ionetn/prodlit/1195_pp.htm, it say that 'The dynamic translation command can now specify a route-map to be processed instead of an access-list. A route-map allows the user to match any combination of access-list, next-hop IP address, and output interface to determine which pool to use'.
Note: I am looking job and can not access Router to practice. So If I am wrong, please let me know. Thanks.
We are pleased to announce availability of Beta software for 16.6.3. 16.6.3 will be the second rebuild on the 16.6 release train targeted towards Catalyst 9500/9400/9300/3850/3650 switching platforms. We are looking for early feedback from custome...