I have a DS3 circuit between two ABRs. Presently the circuit is in area 1 and a virtual link is configured between the two for proper routing. I am changing this area to a NSSA area. In order to maintain optimal routing I now need two(2) circuits between these ABRs one in area 1 the other in area 0. I do not want a $econd DS3 circuit. Is it possible to use a mux/demux at each end to split this existing DS3 circuit into two separate circuits at the routers?
The GRE tunnel seems a little complicated to me and I believe in KISS (keeping it simple) :-)
I am not knowledgable of how sub-interfaces function or their configuration :-( . This DS3 is a single physical point-to-point leased line. Will sub-interfaces take a single physical line and treat it as two logical (virtual) interfaces? How will OSPF treat this? I guess I need to study up on sub-interfaces etc. ;-)
If Mohamed can test this in his lab it would be helpful (Thanks, Mohamed.)
This is actually a pretty cool feature, i didn't even know it existed until I was looking for a solution to advertise a subnet (prefix in BGP talk), only if a certain condition existed. This is exactly what conditional advertisements does
j ai une question j ai achete un routeur cisco 887VA-k9 , je le configuré avec la configuration ci- dessous
si je le lier avec mon pc portable sur l un de ses ports directement ça marche toute est bien ( la connexion internet + m...
Attached policy provides CLI access to the Cisco 4G router over text messaging. Two files are in the attached .tar file:
2. PDF with instructions on how to load and use the .tcl file.