I have two Cat6509 to interconnect. One in production, using SPT priority 8192 for all VLAN (so it is the root). I need to interconenct a second 6509 in parallel for reduncancy (load balacing and alternative path). I will not be able to use layer 3 immediatelly, but later one when I free up the SUP gig interfaces.
How do I have to configure the SPT for the second SW6509? Should I keep the same priority or increase the priority to keep only one as a root?
it depends. Are you running ISL trunks between the switches ? If so, you could use PVST (Per-VLAN-Spanning Tree) to load balance traffic (at layer-2) by forwarding some VLANs on one trunk and other Vlans on another trunk without causing a Spanning Tree loop. That would be better than just increasing the STP priority for the second switch and leaving the first switch as the root.
Thanks, but I will use DOT1Q for the trunks between the switches. I am also planning to have the MSFC2 connected. In fact I intend to have both swithces interconnected in reduncancy. So if one Switch goes down I will have the other handle the core network for that site. Have you done a 6509 interconnection?
[toc:faq]The ProblemOn traditional switches whenever we have a trunk
interface we use the VLAN tag to demultiplex the VLANs. The switch needs
to determine which MAC Address table to look in for a forwarding
decision. To do this we require the switch to do...
[toc:faq]Introduction:Netdr is a tool available on a RSP720, Sup720 or
Sup32 that allows one to capture packets on the RP or SP inband. The
netdr command can be used to capture both Tx and Rx packets in the
software switching path. This is not a substitut...
IntroductionOSPF, being a link-state protocol, allows for every router
in the network to know of every link and OSPF speaker in the entire
network. From this picture each router independently runs the Shortest
Path First (SPF) algorithm to determine the b...