05-19-2006 05:40 AM - edited 03-03-2019 03:17 AM
Hi All
Can someone take a look at this PDF:
http://www.cisco.com/application/pdf/en/us/guest/netsol/ns432/c649/cdccont_0900aecd801a8a2d.pdf
On page 40, figure 41 - with VLAN 2 present on two access layer switches, and both switches uplinked to the two core switches.
In this configuration, wouldn't one of the uplinks be blocked?
Or am I missing something...?
Thanks
05-19-2006 05:43 AM
figure 40 shows 2 blocked paths, one uplink from both of the access switches.
figure 41 shows 1 blocked path, the path between the distribution switches.
this is normal behavior under the configurations shown.
since the 2 access switches are not connected together, there would be no uplink path blocked in figure 41.
05-19-2006 05:58 AM
You sure?
There are four switches - two distribution, two access.
Access A is conx to Dist A, which is connected to Access B, which is connected to Dist B, which is connected to Access A. That's a loop right?
One of those links must be blocked no?
Aaron
05-19-2006 06:11 AM
I personally think they mistakenly put VLAN2 on both Access Switches.
05-21-2006 11:44 PM
OK - just wanted to make sure I'm not missing something obvious...
Aaron
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide