One of our clients is going to upgrade Sup 2 with Sup720. Although Sup720 is supposed to support all the modules (just need power supplies and fans upgrade), our client has received from another country office the notice that they have to upgrade also WS-X6408A modules. Does anybody know if this is true? Could it be due to some incompatibility or bug found in TAC (for example)?
Yes, we know is a classic card, and that it is supposed to be supported, but this guys insist that have received (form their IT collegues in other country) the advise not to use it. Is there a way to check if there is any issue about this combination?
5 Policy Feature Card 3 WS-F6K-PFC3A SAD0xxxxxxx 2.3 Ok
5 MSFC3 Daughterboard WS-SUP720 SAD0xxxxxxx 2.2 Ok
Mod Online Diag Status
While the card will work, it cannot utilize the Sup720's capabilities to the best and probably that it why they might be recommending to upgrade to a newer line card with distributed forwarding capabilities.
Question We run asr9001 with XR 6.1.3, and we have a very long delay to
login w/ SSH 1 or 2 to the device compare to IOS device. After
investigation, the there is 1s delay between the client KEXDH_INIT and
the server (XR) KEXDH_REPLY. After debug ssh serv...
Introduction The purpose of this document is to demonstrate the Open
Shortest Path First (OSPF) behavior when the V-bit (Virtual-link bit) is
present in a non-backbone area. The V-bit is signaled in Type-1 LSA only
if the router is the endpoint of one or ...
Hi, I am seeing quite a few issues with patch install and wanted to
share my experience and workaround to this. Login to admin via CLI, then
access root with the “shell” command Issue “df –h” and you’ll probably
see the following directory full or nearly ...