05-21-2003 11:56 PM - edited 03-02-2019 07:33 AM
Hi all,
I have a router on stick with Cisco 2551XM & Catalyst 2950-SI to manage 2 Class C networks (192.168.1.x/24 & 192.168.2.x/24).
Cisco 2651XM
|
Catalyst 2950 --- VLAN1 switch 192.168.1.x/24 (Catalyst 3550-SMI)
|
VLAN2 switch 192.168.2.x/24 (Catalyst 2950), -> not managed by me.
I want to limit certain users access to internet in 192.168.1.x, and no restriction to 192.168.2.x/24.
1. Can Catalyst2950-SI to perform this, instead of router (applying on trunk interface)? I want to avoid any effects 192.168.2.x users.
2. How about applying traffic shaping in per port basis, instead of ACL based ?
It seems that many QoS features are not available for Standard Image model.
Any ideas and helps will be greatly appreciated. Thank you.
Best regards,
b.go
05-25-2003 09:33 PM
Correct - SI image won't cut it. Upgrade to EI OR Perhaps -
one of - (a) use second ethernet interface in 2651XM to the switch.
Or (b) Try GTS on subinterface (not sure if that will work or not)
06-05-2003 03:38 AM
Hi, thanks for the reply. Yes I have applied/added the traffic shape for the sub interface. So how do I know if the traffic shaping is taking effect or not (for group 10 in this case). Below is the config for the output to internet interface.
interface Serial0/0
ip address ISP_ADD ISP_MASK
ip access-group 100 in
ip nat outside
encapsulation ppp
traffic-shape group 10 64000 8000 8000 1000
group 10 is the LAN that I want to control and group 100 is access for all LANs (including group 10 itself).
Many thanks for the ideas, and suggestions.
Best regards,
b.go
06-06-2003 10:53 PM
hi summons
u can chek the traffic-shape is not happening or not by issuing
ROUTER#sho traffic-shape statistics
Access Queue Packets Bytes Packets Bytes Shaping
I/F List Depth Delayed Delayed Active
Se3/0 152 0 17871 1766254 761 79122 yes
hope this helps ...
regds
prem
Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: